Took over a stalled initiative with no clear business requirements, weak processes, limited documentation, and no stable team structure. Brought clearer operating discipline across governance, engineering, and business stakeholders by defining ownership, documenting processes, and creating a more realistic roadmap and delivery cadence. Led delivery direction and operating structure into a priority-one, two-product program of around 15 people, reducing firefighting around critical risk reporting and giving leadership a more trusted, consistent view.
Lead data platform, governance, and operating-model transformations in complex environments where delivery is unstable, ownership is unclear, and leadership needs clearer roadmap decisions, stronger prioritisation, and a function it can rely on.
Best fit for organisations dealing with legacy complexity, weak ownership, governance debt, and delivery instability.
Turning fragile data estates into trusted business capabilities
Selected highlights
Contributed to a CEO-sponsored transformation using the C-HR model as a pilot, helping shape the migration of processing pipelines and data warehouses to Snowflake. Replacing fragmented, initiative-specific solutions with a more shared and governed data foundation across departments, making it easier to apply governance, track key metrics, and execute against a clearer roadmap. Worked with senior management and Directors to align data scope, governance, reporting expectations, and delivery priorities.
Led the redesign and migration of a fragile legacy exclusions module that was blocking multiple products and creating continuous hyper-care for downstream teams. Made key calls across ownership, process, migration direction, and foundation design to turn it into a more stable, reusable data component. The result reduced support effort by 75%, lowered downstream incidents, and restored more predictable delivery on top of that foundation.
Leadership scope
Beyond platform and delivery execution, I have also contributed to the broader leadership layer of complex data transformations:
- Owned or shaped quarterly and yearly roadmaps across tech, governance, and business teams
- Drove prioritisation across competing delivery, resilience, and governance needs
- Partnered in team structure design as programmes scaled
- Contributed to role definition, candidate evaluation, and onboarding
- Acted as a functional lead across critical engineering streams, setting expectations around quality and ownership
- Advised on platform investment, staffing mix, and resourcing trade-offs
- Helped senior stakeholders navigate trade-offs between delivery speed, governance maturity, and operational risk
My focus
Turn legacy components, fragile flows, unclear ownership and constant hyper-care. I focus on turning these into predictable, reusable foundations so products can ship reliably and teams can stop firefighting.
Cloud/data platform migrations, Snowflake, and governance setups that give the organisation one shared, trusted foundation, instead of every project reinventing its own data solution.
Standards, mentoring, documentation and delivery workflows that make good practices the default. I care about sustainable delivery, not heroics.
Turn reactive environments into structured roadmaps by sequencing initiatives, managing dependencies, defining milestones, and making explicit trade-offs between platform debt, migrations, governance work, and new delivery requests.
Define how the function works in practice: ownership boundaries, prioritisation rules, team interaction, standards, documentation, and where governance needs to be enforced first.
As programmes scale, I help define the roles needed, support hiring and onboarding, coach engineers through ambiguity, and raise expectations around ownership, quality, and delivery discipline.
Operating principles
A data team is a product in itself – with clear owners, SLAs, and a roadmap, not a ticket factory.
What I care about in the first weeks
At the start, I’m not trying to redesign everything. I focus on understanding a few critical things:
- Where data can really hurt the business: the products, processes or reports that cause real damage if data is wrong, late, or missing.
- Which flows are fragile and who owns them (or doesn’t): the pipelines, models, or systems everyone fears touching, and whether anyone is truly accountable.
- How much firefighting is normalised: where people are doing “hero work” and treating incidents as routine instead of signals.
- How teams actually work vs slide decks: how requests come in, how priorities are set, and how “done” is defined in reality.
- Where minimal governance & documentation would unlock speed: the smallest set of rules and docs that would reduce friction and hand-offs.
- Team health and skills: who is overloaded, who is underused, and what can realistically be taken on without burning people out.
- What leadership really expects from data: how executives talk about data, what they think is possible, and where expectations and reality diverge.
Experience
A simplified view. Full details are on my LinkedIn and resume.
About
Over time, my role has expanded beyond platform delivery itself. In high-priority transformations, I have helped shape roadmaps, define team structures, support hiring, guide prioritisation, coach engineers through ambiguity, and frame trade-offs for senior stakeholders.
My strongest foundation is still in data platform, governance, and delivery transformation, but I operate with the data function in mind, not just the technology stack
Let’s talk
If your data function needs stronger foundations, clearer ownership, and more predictable delivery, I’d be glad to talk.